Delhi High Court instructs Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal, and others to compensate Army Officer ₹2 crore for defamation.

Army Officer Defamed in Tehelka Sting Operation Wins Defamation Suit

The Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of Lt Gen Tejinder Singh Ahluwalia, a retired army officer, in a defamation suit filed against news outlet Tehelka and its journalists. The order was passed nearly 22 years after Tehelka conducted a sting operation, known as Operation West End in 2001, alleging that Ahluwalia was involved in taking bribes in defense deals.

Background

Following the sting operation, a court of inquiry was held, which recommended Ahluwalia’s dismissal from service. However, the then Army Chief awarded him “severe displeasure (recordable)” instead, stating that he was “unbecoming of an army officer.”

Court Ruling

In a detailed order, Justice Neena Bansal Krishna stated that Tehelka and its journalists defamed Ahluwalia by showing comments in the news reports that he had never demanded any money. The court ruled that the apology in this case has become irrelevant, as Ahluwalia had already suffered the Court of Inquiry and was declared “unbecoming of an army officer.”

The court emphasized the damage caused to Ahluwalia’s reputation, stating, “The reputation of the plaintiff has suffered as he not only faced lowering of estimation in the eyes of the public, but his character also got maligned with serious allegations of corruption which no subsequent refutation can redress or heal. Much time has passed, and the plaintiff has already lived with ill fame for more than 23 years.”

Implications

This ruling highlights the enduring impact of defamation on an individual’s reputation, even after a long period of time. It emphasizes the need for responsible journalism and thorough fact-checking before making damaging allegations against individuals.

Conclusion

Lt Gen Tejinder Singh Ahluwalia’s victory in the defamation suit against Tehelka and its journalists serves as a reminder that false and defamatory statements can have long-lasting consequences. The court’s ruling reinforces the importance of upholding the principles of truth and accuracy in journalism.