Title: Parliament Witnesses Heated Debate on No-Confidence Motion Over Manipur Violence
Introduction:
The Parliament engaged in a heated debate on Tuesday as it began discussing a no-confidence motion against the PM Modi-led Centre over ethnic violence in Manipur. The opposition, led by Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi, criticized PM Narendra Modi’s silence on the issue. The debate will continue until August 10, with Rahul Gandhi expected to speak when PM Modi responds to the charges.
HTML Subheadings:
1. Opposition Charges and Demands
2. Government’s Defense and Counter-Attacks
3. Rahul Gandhi’s Absence Raises Questions
4. Rijiju vs. Ramesh: Visits to Manipur
Opposition’s Charge:
★Several opposition MPs called for the resignation of Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh and questioned PM Modi’s silence on the issue.
★Gaurav Gogoi highlighted the opposition’s demand for justice for Manipur and criticized PM Modi for his delayed response and failure to remove the CM.
★Congress MP Manish Tewari emphasized the impact of unrest in Manipur on the entire northeast region and the nation.
★TMC MP Saugata Roy demanded the immediate dismissal of the Manipur government and the imposition of President’s rule.
★NCP MP Supriya Sule urged the resignation of CM Biren Singh and criticized PM Modi for his foreign tours while Manipur was facing violence.
★Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav condemned the state-sponsored ethnic violence in Manipur and demanded PM Modi’s presence during the debate.
Government’s Defense:
★BJP MP Nishikant Dubey mocked the opposition’s newly-formed alliance called INDIA and defended the government’s efforts in uplifting the poor.
★Union Minister Kiren Rijiju accused the opposition of bringing the no-confidence motion at the wrong time and emphasized PM Modi’s leadership and focus on the northeast region’s development.
★Rijiju attributed the problems in Manipur to negligence by previous Congress governments and urged members not to speak against the country in foreign universities.
★BJD MP Pinaki Misra criticized the opposition’s motion, stating that it defies common sense and logic, and urged them to take their case to the people.
Rahul Gandhi’s Absence Raises Questions:
★Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi questioned Rahul Gandhi’s absence as the lead speaker for the no-confidence motion.
★BJP MP Nishikant Dubey suggested that Rahul Gandhi did not initiate the debate because he “probably got up late.”
★Dubey also referred to the Supreme Court’s stay on Rahul Gandhi’s conviction in the “Modi surname” remark case, questioning his absence and his statement of not apologizing.
Rijiju vs. Ramesh: Visits to Manipur:
★The Congress challenged Union Minister Kiren Rijiju to provide details of the visits of Union ministers to Manipur in the last 97 days.
★Rijiju defended PM Modi’s directive to ministers to visit the Northeast every 15 days, emphasizing the government’s commitment to reaching the people.
In summary, the Parliament witnessed a heated debate on the no-confidence motion against the PM Modi-led Centre over ethnic violence in Manipur. The opposition demanded the resignation of Manipur CM Biren Singh, questioned PM Modi’s silence, and criticized the government’s handling of the situation. The government defended its actions and accused the opposition of bringing the motion at the wrong time. Rahul Gandhi’s absence and the visits to Manipur by Union ministers were also discussed during the debate.
Follow DelhiBreakings on Google News
Superfast News Coverage by DelhiBreakings.com team.
For Superfast national news and Delhi Breaking Stories visit us daily at https://delhibreakings.com
